1. Aittasalo, M., et al., Socio-Ecological Natural Experiment with Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Active Commuting to Work: Process Evaluation, Behavioral Impacts, and Changes in the Use and Quality of Walking and Cycling Paths. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. 16(9).
2. Audrey, S., et al., Evaluation of an intervention to promote walking during the commute to work: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC public health, 2019. 19(1): p. 427.
3. Bickerstaff, K. and S. Shaw, An Evaluation of the Walking Bus at Pirehill First School. 2000, Staffordshire University: CAST.
4. Blake, H., et al., Active8! Technology-Based Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Hospital Employees. American journal of health promotion: AJHP, 2017. 31(2): p. 109-118.
5. Boarnet, M.G., et al., California's Safe Routes to School Program: Impacts on Walking, Bicycling, and Pedestrian Safety. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2005. 71(3): p. 301-317.
6. Boarnet, M.G., et al., The exposition light rail line study: a before and after study of the impact of new light rail transit service. 2013.
7. Brockman, R. and K. Fox, Physical activity by stealth? The potential health benefits of a workplace transport plan. Public health, 2011. 125(4): p. 210-216.
8. Brown, B.B., et al., A complete street intervention promote walking to transit, non-transit walking, and bicycling: a quasi-experimental demonstration of increased use. Journal of physical activity & health, 2016. 13(11): p. 1210.
9. Brown, B.B. and C.M. Werner, Before and after a new light rail stop: resident attitudes, travel behavior, and obesity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2008. 75(1): p. 5-12.
10. Buliung, R., et al., School travel planning: mobilizing school and community resources to encourage active school transportation. J Sch Health, 2011. 81(11): p. 704-12.
11. Bull, F.C.L.A., E.J. Hooper, P.L. , Project Evaluation Report - Well@Work. 2008, Newham University Hospital NHS Trust.
12. Bungum, T.J., S. Clark, and B. Aguilar, The Effect of an Active Transport to School Intervention at a Suburban Elementary School. American Journal of Health Education, 2014. 45(4): p. 205-209.
13. Christian, H., et al., A new urban planning code’s impact on walking: The residential environments project. American journal of public health, 2013. 103(7): p. 1219-1228.
14. Christiansen, L.B., et al., Effects of a Danish multicomponent physical activity intervention on active school transport. Journal of Transport & Health, 2014. 1(3): p. 174-181.
15. CLES Centre for Local Economic Strategies, Evaluation of get walking keep walking: interim data report May 2011. 2011, CLES/Ramblers.
16. Collins, P.A. and A. Agarwal, Impacts of public transit improvements on ridership, and implications for physical activity, in a low-density Canadian city. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2015. 2: p. 874-879.
17. Coombes, E. and A. Jones, Gamification of active travel to school: A pilot evaluation of the Beat the Street physical activity intervention. Health & place, 2016. 39: p. 62-9.
18. Cope, Cycling in the city regions: delivering a step change. . 2011: Sustrans.
19. Crawford, S. and J. Garrard, A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2013. 2013: p. 816961.
20. DETR, School travel strategies and plans, A) Burnholme Community College. 1999a, DETR: London.
21. DETR, School travel strategies and plans, B) Horndean Community School. 1999b, DETR: London.
22. DETR, School travel strategies and plans, C) Sandringham school. 1999c, DETR: London.
23. DETR, School travel strategies and plans, D) Wheatfields Junior School. 1999d, DETR: London.
24. DETR, School travel strategies and plans, E) Kesgrave High School. 1999e, DETR: London.
25. Dinger, M.K., K.C. Heesch, and K.R. McClary, Feasibility of a minimal contact intervention to promote walking among insufficiently active women. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2005. 20(1): p. 2-6.
26. Ducheyne, F., et al., Effects of a cycle training course on children's cycling skills and levels of cycling to school. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014. 67: p. 49-60.
27. Dunton, G.F., et al., Investigating the impact of a smart growth community on the contexts of children's physical activity using Ecological Momentary Assessment. Health & Place, 2012. 18(1): p. 76-84.
28. Evenson, K.R., A.H. Herring, and S.L. Huston, Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail. Am J Prev Med, 2005. 28(2 Suppl 2): p. 177-85.
29. Filho, V.C.B., et al., A Physical Activity Intervention for Brazilian Students From Low Human Development Index Areas: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of physical activity & health, 2016. 13(11): p. 1174-1182.
30. Fitzhugh, E.C., D.R. Bassett, Jr., and M.F. Evans, Urban trails and physical activity: a natural experiment. Am J Prev Med, 2010. 39(3): p. 259-62.
31. Ginja, S., et al., Feasibility of an incentive scheme to promote active travel to school: a pilot cluster randomised trial. Pilot and feasibility studies, 2017. 3: p. 57.
32. Goodman, A., et al., Effectiveness and equity impacts of town-wide cycling initiatives in England: a longitudinal, controlled natural experimental study. Social science & medicine, 2013. 97: p. 228-237.
33. Goodman, A., et al., Who uses new walking and cycling infrastructure and how? Longitudinal results from the UK iConnect study. Preventive medicine, 2013. 57(5): p. 518-524.
34. Gustat, J., et al., Effect of changes to the neighborhood built environment on physical activity in a low-income African American neighborhood. Preventing chronic disease, 2012. 9.
35. Heinen, E., et al., Does exposure to new transport infrastructure result in modal shifts? Patterns of change in commute mode choices in a four-year quasi-experimental cohort study. Journal of transport & health, 2017. 6: p. 396-410.
36. Heinen, E., et al., Changes in mode of travel to work: a natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2015. 12(1): p. 1-10.
37. Hendricks, K., et al., Transforming a small midwestern city for physical activity: from the sidewalks up. Journal of physical activity & health, 2009. 6(6).
38. Hinckson, E.A., N. Garrett, and S. Duncan, Active commuting to school in New Zealand children (2004-2008): a quantitative analysis. Prev Med, 2011. 52(5): p. 332-6.
39. Hirsch, J.A., et al., Municipal investment in off-road trails and changes in bicycle commuting in Minneapolis, Minnesota over 10 years: a longitudinal repeated cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2017. 14(1): p. 21.
40. Hoelscher, D., et al., Effects of funding allocation for safe routes to school programs on active commuting to school and related behavioral, knowledge, and psychosocial outcomes: results from the Texas childhood obesity prevention policy evaluation (T-COPPE) study. Environment and Behavior, 2016. 48(1): p. 210-229.
41. Humpel, N., et al., Trial of print and telephone delivered interventions to influence walking. Preventive Medicine, 2004. 39(3): p. 635-641.
42. Isensee, B., et al., Effects of a School-Based Pedometer Intervention in Adolescents: 1-Year Follow-Up of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of school health, 2018. 88(10): p. 717-724.
43. Johnston, B.D., et al., Promoting physical activity and reducing child pedestrian risk: Early evaluation of a walking school bus program in central Seattle. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2006. 60(6): p. 1388-1389.
44. Knott, C.S., et al., Changes in workplace car parking and commute mode: a natural experimental study. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2019. 73(1): p. 42-49.
45. Knuiman, M.W., et al., A longitudinal analysis of the influence of the neighborhood built environment on walking for transportation: the RESIDE study. American journal of epidemiology, 2014. 180(5): p. 453-461.
46. Krieger, J., et al., High point walking for health: creating built and social environments that support walking in a public housing community. American Journal of Public Health, 2009. 99(S3): p. S593-S599.
47. Krizek, K.J., G. Barnes, and K. Thompson, Analyzing the Effect of Bicycle Facilities on Commute Mode Share over Time. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2009. 135(2): p. 66-73.
48. Lambe, B., The effectiveness of active travel initiatives in Irish provincial towns: an evaluation of a quasi-experimental natural experiment. 2015, Waterford Institute of Technology.
49. Mackett, R., et al., Walking buses in Hertfordshire: Impacts and lessons. University College London. London, England, 2005. Retrieved from: https://my.wpi.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-162797-dt-content-rid867904_1/courses/ID2050-D13-D01/Walking bus report-UCL.pdf
50. Malakellis, M., et al., School-based systems change for obesity prevention in adolescents: outcomes of the Australian Capital Territory 'It's Your Move!'. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 2017. 41(5): p. 490-496.
51. Mammen, G., et al., Active school travel: An evaluation of the Canadian school travel planning intervention. Preventive Medicine, 2014. 60: p. 55-59.
52. McDonald, N.C., et al., Impact of the Safe Routes to School program on walking and biking: Eugene, Oregon study. Transport Policy, 2013. 29: p. 243-248.
53. McKee, R., et al., Promoting walking to school: results of a quasi-experimental trial. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2007. 61(9): p. 818-823.
54. McMinn, D., et al., The effect of a school-based active commuting intervention on children's commuting physical activity and daily physical activity. Prev Med, 2012. 54(5): p. 316-8.
55. Mendoza, J.A., et al., Bicycle Trains, Cycling, and Physical Activity: A Pilot Cluster RCT. American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. 53(4): p. 481-489.
56. Mendoza, J.A., D.D. Levinger, and B.D. Johnston, Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community. BMC public health, 2009. 9(1): p. 1-7.
57. Mendoza, J.A., et al., The walking school bus and children's physical activity: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 2011. 128(3): p. e537-e544.
58. Merom, D., et al., Effect of Australia's Walk to Work Day campaign on adults' active commuting and physical activity behavior. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2005. 19(3): p. 159-162.
59. Merom, D., et al., Predictors of initiating and maintaining active commuting to work using transport and public health perspectives in Australia. Preventive medicine, 2008. 47(3): p. 342-346.
60. Miller, H.J., et al., Public transit generates new physical activity: evidence from individual GPS and accelerometer data before and after light rail construction in a neighborhood of Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Health & place, 2015. 36: p. 8-17.
61. Milton, K., P. KELLY, and C. FOSTER, Evaluation of the Ramblers Family Walking Programme–Furness Families Walk4Life. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, 2009.
62. Mutrie, N., et al., “Walk in to Work Out”: a randomised controlled trial of a self help intervention to promote active commuting. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2002. 56(6): p. 407-412.
63. Nakayama, S. and J.-i. Takayama, Ecotravel Coordinator Program:Effects on Travel Behavior and Environmental Attitude. Transportation Research Record, 2005. 1924(1): p. 224-230.
64. Newson, C., S. Cairns, and A. Davis, Making school travel plans work. Experience from English case studies, Transport for Quality of Life, Campaign for Better Transport, University College London, Adrian Davis Associates, Sustrans, Cleary Hughes Associates, 2010.
65. Orenstein, M.R., et al., Safe Routes to School safety and mobility analysis. 2007.
66. Osborne. P, Bike It, in WHO, Collaboration between the health and transport sectors in promoting physical activity: examples from European countries (CD Rom). 2006, WHO: Copenhagen.
67. Østergaard, L., J.T. Støckel, and L.B. Andersen, Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study. BMC public health, 2015. 15(1): p. 1-8.
68. Panter, J., et al., Impact of new transport infrastructure on walking, cycling, and physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 2016. 50(2): p. e45-e53.
69. Pedroso, F.E., et al., Bicycle Use and Cyclist Safety Following Boston’s Bicycle Infrastructure Expansion, 2009–2012. American Journal of Public Health, 2016. 106(12): p. 2171-2177.
70. Petrunoff, N., L.M. Wen, and C. Rissel, Effects of a workplace travel plan intervention encouraging active travel to work: outcomes from a three-year time-series study. Public health, 2016. 135: p. 38-47.
71. Rissel, C.E., et al., The effectiveness of community-based cycling promotion: findings from the Cycling Connecting Communities project in Sydney, Australia. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2010. 7(1): p. 1-11.
72. Rodriguez, N.M., et al., Enhancing safe routes to school programs through community-engaged citizen science: two pilot investigations in lower density areas of Santa Clara County, California, USA. BMC public health, 2019. 19(1): p. 256.
73. Rowland, D., et al., Randomised controlled trial of site specific advice on school travel patterns. Archives of disease in childhood, 2003. 88(1): p. 8-11.
74. Sahlqvist, S., et al., Impact of an Australian state-wide active travel campaign targeting primary schools. Preventive medicine reports, 2019. 14: p. 100866.
75. Sevil, J., et al., Can High Schools Be an Effective Setting to Promote Healthy Lifestyles? Effects of a Multiple Behavior Change Intervention in Adolescents. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2019. 64(4): p. 478-486.
76. Simon, C., et al., Successful overweight prevention in adolescents by increasing physical activity: a 4-year randomized controlled intervention. International journal of obesity, 2008. 32(10): p. 1489-1498.
77. Staunton, C.E., D. Hubsmith, and W. Kallins, Promoting safe walking and biking to school: the Marin County success story. American journal of public health, 2003. 93(9): p. 1431-1434.
78. Stewart, O., A.V. Moudon, and C. Claybrooke, Multistate evaluation of safe routes to school programs. American journal of health promotion, 2014. 28(3_suppl): p. S89-S96.
79. Sustrans, Bike It Case Study - Cinnamon Brow Primary School. 2007.
80. Sustrans, Bike It Review. 2008.
81. TAPESTRY, Walking to school campaign case study. 2003: Hertfordshire.
82. Travelsmart, Evaluation of Australian TravelSmart Projects in the ACT, South Australia, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia: 2001-2005. 2006, Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of Environment and Heritage.
83. Travelsmart, Travelsmart project Review. . 2011.
84. Vanwolleghem, G., et al., Feasibility and effectiveness of drop-off spots to promote walking to school. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2014. 11(1): p. 136.
85. Villa-González, E., et al., Effectiveness of an active commuting school-based intervention at 6-month follow-up. European Journal of Public Health, 2015. 26(2): p. 272-276.
86. Wen, L.M., et al., Increasing active travel to school: are we on the right track? A cluster randomised controlled trial from Sydney, Australia. Preventive medicine, 2008. 47(6): p. 612-618.
87. Zaccari, V. and H. Dirkis, Walking to school in inner Sydney. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2003. 14(2): p. 137-140.